Review



3404 genomes  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    ATCC 3404 genomes
    SNP‐based phylogenetic tree of hospital isolates and the ATCC control reference genome, C. tropicalis <t>MYA‐3404.</t>
    3404 Genomes, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 75 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/3404 genomes/product/ATCC
    Average 95 stars, based on 75 article reviews
    3404 genomes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    95/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Integrated Genomic and Phenotypic Analyses Reveal Convergent Resistance Patterns in Clinical Candida tropicalis Isolates"

    Article Title: Integrated Genomic and Phenotypic Analyses Reveal Convergent Resistance Patterns in Clinical Candida tropicalis Isolates

    Journal: Mycoses

    doi: 10.1111/myc.70181

    SNP‐based phylogenetic tree of hospital isolates and the ATCC control reference genome, C. tropicalis MYA‐3404.
    Figure Legend Snippet: SNP‐based phylogenetic tree of hospital isolates and the ATCC control reference genome, C. tropicalis MYA‐3404.

    Techniques Used: Control

    Quantification of ergosterol content. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using One‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.4182; Control versus 47: p = 0.0009; Control versus 50: p < 0.0001; Control versus 52: p < 0.0001; Control versus 53: p < 0.0001; Control versus 54: p = 0.9957; Control versus 57: p = 0.0066; Control versus 58: p = 0.0838; Control versus 60: p = 0.0051; Control versus 61: p = 0.9997; Control versus 62: p = 0.0004; Control versus 63: p = 0.0003; Control versus 65: p = 0.0032; Control versus 66: p = 0.2012.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Quantification of ergosterol content. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using One‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.4182; Control versus 47: p = 0.0009; Control versus 50: p < 0.0001; Control versus 52: p < 0.0001; Control versus 53: p < 0.0001; Control versus 54: p = 0.9957; Control versus 57: p = 0.0066; Control versus 58: p = 0.0838; Control versus 60: p = 0.0051; Control versus 61: p = 0.9997; Control versus 62: p = 0.0004; Control versus 63: p = 0.0003; Control versus 65: p = 0.0032; Control versus 66: p = 0.2012.

    Techniques Used: Control

    Adhesion to human cells. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using One‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.0001; Control versus 47: p = 0.0283; Control versus 50: p = 0.9997; Control versus 52: p = 0.9341; Control versus 53: p = 0.002; Control versus 54: p = 0.9999; Control versus 57: p > 0.9999; Control versus 58: p = 0.1689; Control versus 60: p = 0.0016; Control versus 61: p = 0.8017; Control versus 62: p = 0.0027; Control versus 63: p = 0.0035; Control versus 65: p = 0.9653; Control versus 66: p = 0.6953.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Adhesion to human cells. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using One‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.0001; Control versus 47: p = 0.0283; Control versus 50: p = 0.9997; Control versus 52: p = 0.9341; Control versus 53: p = 0.002; Control versus 54: p = 0.9999; Control versus 57: p > 0.9999; Control versus 58: p = 0.1689; Control versus 60: p = 0.0016; Control versus 61: p = 0.8017; Control versus 62: p = 0.0027; Control versus 63: p = 0.0035; Control versus 65: p = 0.9653; Control versus 66: p = 0.6953.

    Techniques Used: Control

    Biofilm formation. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using one‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.0001; Control versus 47: p < 0.0001; Control versus 50: p < 0.0001; Control versus 52: p = 0.0588; Control versus 53: p = 0.0221; Control versus 54: p < 0.0001; Control versus 57: p = 0.9993; Control versus 58: p = 0.0644; Control versus 60: p = 0.5937; Control versus 61: p < 0.0001; Control versus 62: p = 0.1254; Control versus 63: p = 0.0971; Control versus 65: p = 0.5359; Control versus 66: p < 0.0001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Biofilm formation. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using one‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.0001; Control versus 47: p < 0.0001; Control versus 50: p < 0.0001; Control versus 52: p = 0.0588; Control versus 53: p = 0.0221; Control versus 54: p < 0.0001; Control versus 57: p = 0.9993; Control versus 58: p = 0.0644; Control versus 60: p = 0.5937; Control versus 61: p < 0.0001; Control versus 62: p = 0.1254; Control versus 63: p = 0.0971; Control versus 65: p = 0.5359; Control versus 66: p < 0.0001.

    Techniques Used: Control

    Quantification of chitin content. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using One‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.1409; Control versus 47: p = 0.9911; Control versus 50: p = 0.9996; Control versus 52: p = 0.0012; Control versus 53: p = 0.408; Control versus 54: p = 0.408; Control versus 57: p = 0.0034; Control versus 58: p = 0.0024; Control versus 60: p < 0.0001; Control versus 61: p = 0.0007; Control versus 62: p = 0.0005; Control versus 63: p < 0.0001; Control versus 65: p = 0.0403; Control versus 66: p < 0.0001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Quantification of chitin content. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using One‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.1409; Control versus 47: p = 0.9911; Control versus 50: p = 0.9996; Control versus 52: p = 0.0012; Control versus 53: p = 0.408; Control versus 54: p = 0.408; Control versus 57: p = 0.0034; Control versus 58: p = 0.0024; Control versus 60: p < 0.0001; Control versus 61: p = 0.0007; Control versus 62: p = 0.0005; Control versus 63: p < 0.0001; Control versus 65: p = 0.0403; Control versus 66: p < 0.0001.

    Techniques Used: Control



    Similar Products

    95
    ATCC 3404 genomes
    SNP‐based phylogenetic tree of hospital isolates and the ATCC control reference genome, C. tropicalis <t>MYA‐3404.</t>
    3404 Genomes, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/3404 genomes/product/ATCC
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    3404 genomes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    ATCC c tropicalis atcc 750 genome
    SNP‐based phylogenetic tree of hospital isolates and the ATCC control reference genome, C. tropicalis <t>MYA‐3404.</t>
    C Tropicalis Atcc 750 Genome, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/c tropicalis atcc 750 genome/product/ATCC
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    c tropicalis atcc 750 genome - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Gallus BioPharmaceuticals reference mitochondrial genomes amphibians xenopus tropicalis ay789013
    SNP‐based phylogenetic tree of hospital isolates and the ATCC control reference genome, C. tropicalis <t>MYA‐3404.</t>
    Reference Mitochondrial Genomes Amphibians Xenopus Tropicalis Ay789013, supplied by Gallus BioPharmaceuticals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/reference mitochondrial genomes amphibians xenopus tropicalis ay789013/product/Gallus BioPharmaceuticals
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    reference mitochondrial genomes amphibians xenopus tropicalis ay789013 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    ATCC 3404 genome database
    SNP‐based phylogenetic tree of hospital isolates and the ATCC control reference genome, C. tropicalis <t>MYA‐3404.</t>
    3404 Genome Database, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/3404 genome database/product/ATCC
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    3404 genome database - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    ATCC candida tropicalis
    SNP‐based phylogenetic tree of hospital isolates and the ATCC control reference genome, C. tropicalis <t>MYA‐3404.</t>
    Candida Tropicalis, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/candida tropicalis/product/ATCC
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    candida tropicalis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Thermo Fisher xenopus tropicalis genome array
    The <t>Xenopus</t> <t>tropicalis</t> tadpole has the capacity to regenerate its tail . ( A ) Schematic diagram of the tissues located in the Xenopus tropicalis tadpole tail. ( B ) Transverse section of tadpole tail visualized with toluidine blue. ( C-E ) An amputated tail (C), uncut tail (D), and regenerated tail 7 days after amputation (E). ( F-H ) Immunostaining against skeletal muscle (12/101; F), neurons (acetylated tubulin; G), and vasculature (mTie-2::eGFP transgene; H). ( I-O ) A regenerated tail at one month post-amputation (I). Immunostaining showing skeletal muscle (12/101; J, K), neurons (acetylated tubulin; L, M), and vasculature (mTieGFP transgene; N, O) in non-cut and regenerated tails 28 days post amputation. Green arrowhead depicts amputation site; red arrowhead shows parallel axonal tract; orange arrowheads shows parallel blood vessels. Red scale bar is 1000 μm.
    Xenopus Tropicalis Genome Array, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/xenopus tropicalis genome array/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    xenopus tropicalis genome array - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    SNP‐based phylogenetic tree of hospital isolates and the ATCC control reference genome, C. tropicalis MYA‐3404.

    Journal: Mycoses

    Article Title: Integrated Genomic and Phenotypic Analyses Reveal Convergent Resistance Patterns in Clinical Candida tropicalis Isolates

    doi: 10.1111/myc.70181

    Figure Lengend Snippet: SNP‐based phylogenetic tree of hospital isolates and the ATCC control reference genome, C. tropicalis MYA‐3404.

    Article Snippet: SNPs of the ATCC C. tropicalis MYA‐3404 genomes were compared to the SNPs of the isolates by using the snippy multicommand (snippy‐base application v4.5.0) [ ] that generates a core genome multiple alignment against a common reference.

    Techniques: Control

    Quantification of ergosterol content. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using One‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.4182; Control versus 47: p = 0.0009; Control versus 50: p < 0.0001; Control versus 52: p < 0.0001; Control versus 53: p < 0.0001; Control versus 54: p = 0.9957; Control versus 57: p = 0.0066; Control versus 58: p = 0.0838; Control versus 60: p = 0.0051; Control versus 61: p = 0.9997; Control versus 62: p = 0.0004; Control versus 63: p = 0.0003; Control versus 65: p = 0.0032; Control versus 66: p = 0.2012.

    Journal: Mycoses

    Article Title: Integrated Genomic and Phenotypic Analyses Reveal Convergent Resistance Patterns in Clinical Candida tropicalis Isolates

    doi: 10.1111/myc.70181

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Quantification of ergosterol content. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using One‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.4182; Control versus 47: p = 0.0009; Control versus 50: p < 0.0001; Control versus 52: p < 0.0001; Control versus 53: p < 0.0001; Control versus 54: p = 0.9957; Control versus 57: p = 0.0066; Control versus 58: p = 0.0838; Control versus 60: p = 0.0051; Control versus 61: p = 0.9997; Control versus 62: p = 0.0004; Control versus 63: p = 0.0003; Control versus 65: p = 0.0032; Control versus 66: p = 0.2012.

    Article Snippet: SNPs of the ATCC C. tropicalis MYA‐3404 genomes were compared to the SNPs of the isolates by using the snippy multicommand (snippy‐base application v4.5.0) [ ] that generates a core genome multiple alignment against a common reference.

    Techniques: Control

    Adhesion to human cells. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using One‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.0001; Control versus 47: p = 0.0283; Control versus 50: p = 0.9997; Control versus 52: p = 0.9341; Control versus 53: p = 0.002; Control versus 54: p = 0.9999; Control versus 57: p > 0.9999; Control versus 58: p = 0.1689; Control versus 60: p = 0.0016; Control versus 61: p = 0.8017; Control versus 62: p = 0.0027; Control versus 63: p = 0.0035; Control versus 65: p = 0.9653; Control versus 66: p = 0.6953.

    Journal: Mycoses

    Article Title: Integrated Genomic and Phenotypic Analyses Reveal Convergent Resistance Patterns in Clinical Candida tropicalis Isolates

    doi: 10.1111/myc.70181

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Adhesion to human cells. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using One‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.0001; Control versus 47: p = 0.0283; Control versus 50: p = 0.9997; Control versus 52: p = 0.9341; Control versus 53: p = 0.002; Control versus 54: p = 0.9999; Control versus 57: p > 0.9999; Control versus 58: p = 0.1689; Control versus 60: p = 0.0016; Control versus 61: p = 0.8017; Control versus 62: p = 0.0027; Control versus 63: p = 0.0035; Control versus 65: p = 0.9653; Control versus 66: p = 0.6953.

    Article Snippet: SNPs of the ATCC C. tropicalis MYA‐3404 genomes were compared to the SNPs of the isolates by using the snippy multicommand (snippy‐base application v4.5.0) [ ] that generates a core genome multiple alignment against a common reference.

    Techniques: Control

    Biofilm formation. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using one‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.0001; Control versus 47: p < 0.0001; Control versus 50: p < 0.0001; Control versus 52: p = 0.0588; Control versus 53: p = 0.0221; Control versus 54: p < 0.0001; Control versus 57: p = 0.9993; Control versus 58: p = 0.0644; Control versus 60: p = 0.5937; Control versus 61: p < 0.0001; Control versus 62: p = 0.1254; Control versus 63: p = 0.0971; Control versus 65: p = 0.5359; Control versus 66: p < 0.0001.

    Journal: Mycoses

    Article Title: Integrated Genomic and Phenotypic Analyses Reveal Convergent Resistance Patterns in Clinical Candida tropicalis Isolates

    doi: 10.1111/myc.70181

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Biofilm formation. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using one‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.0001; Control versus 47: p < 0.0001; Control versus 50: p < 0.0001; Control versus 52: p = 0.0588; Control versus 53: p = 0.0221; Control versus 54: p < 0.0001; Control versus 57: p = 0.9993; Control versus 58: p = 0.0644; Control versus 60: p = 0.5937; Control versus 61: p < 0.0001; Control versus 62: p = 0.1254; Control versus 63: p = 0.0971; Control versus 65: p = 0.5359; Control versus 66: p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: SNPs of the ATCC C. tropicalis MYA‐3404 genomes were compared to the SNPs of the isolates by using the snippy multicommand (snippy‐base application v4.5.0) [ ] that generates a core genome multiple alignment against a common reference.

    Techniques: Control

    Quantification of chitin content. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using One‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.1409; Control versus 47: p = 0.9911; Control versus 50: p = 0.9996; Control versus 52: p = 0.0012; Control versus 53: p = 0.408; Control versus 54: p = 0.408; Control versus 57: p = 0.0034; Control versus 58: p = 0.0024; Control versus 60: p < 0.0001; Control versus 61: p = 0.0007; Control versus 62: p = 0.0005; Control versus 63: p < 0.0001; Control versus 65: p = 0.0403; Control versus 66: p < 0.0001.

    Journal: Mycoses

    Article Title: Integrated Genomic and Phenotypic Analyses Reveal Convergent Resistance Patterns in Clinical Candida tropicalis Isolates

    doi: 10.1111/myc.70181

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Quantification of chitin content. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using One‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.1409; Control versus 47: p = 0.9911; Control versus 50: p = 0.9996; Control versus 52: p = 0.0012; Control versus 53: p = 0.408; Control versus 54: p = 0.408; Control versus 57: p = 0.0034; Control versus 58: p = 0.0024; Control versus 60: p < 0.0001; Control versus 61: p = 0.0007; Control versus 62: p = 0.0005; Control versus 63: p < 0.0001; Control versus 65: p = 0.0403; Control versus 66: p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: SNPs of the ATCC C. tropicalis MYA‐3404 genomes were compared to the SNPs of the isolates by using the snippy multicommand (snippy‐base application v4.5.0) [ ] that generates a core genome multiple alignment against a common reference.

    Techniques: Control

    The Xenopus tropicalis tadpole has the capacity to regenerate its tail . ( A ) Schematic diagram of the tissues located in the Xenopus tropicalis tadpole tail. ( B ) Transverse section of tadpole tail visualized with toluidine blue. ( C-E ) An amputated tail (C), uncut tail (D), and regenerated tail 7 days after amputation (E). ( F-H ) Immunostaining against skeletal muscle (12/101; F), neurons (acetylated tubulin; G), and vasculature (mTie-2::eGFP transgene; H). ( I-O ) A regenerated tail at one month post-amputation (I). Immunostaining showing skeletal muscle (12/101; J, K), neurons (acetylated tubulin; L, M), and vasculature (mTieGFP transgene; N, O) in non-cut and regenerated tails 28 days post amputation. Green arrowhead depicts amputation site; red arrowhead shows parallel axonal tract; orange arrowheads shows parallel blood vessels. Red scale bar is 1000 μm.

    Journal: BMC Developmental Biology

    Article Title: Genome-wide analysis of gene expression during Xenopus tropicalis tadpole tail regeneration

    doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-11-70

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The Xenopus tropicalis tadpole has the capacity to regenerate its tail . ( A ) Schematic diagram of the tissues located in the Xenopus tropicalis tadpole tail. ( B ) Transverse section of tadpole tail visualized with toluidine blue. ( C-E ) An amputated tail (C), uncut tail (D), and regenerated tail 7 days after amputation (E). ( F-H ) Immunostaining against skeletal muscle (12/101; F), neurons (acetylated tubulin; G), and vasculature (mTie-2::eGFP transgene; H). ( I-O ) A regenerated tail at one month post-amputation (I). Immunostaining showing skeletal muscle (12/101; J, K), neurons (acetylated tubulin; L, M), and vasculature (mTieGFP transgene; N, O) in non-cut and regenerated tails 28 days post amputation. Green arrowhead depicts amputation site; red arrowhead shows parallel axonal tract; orange arrowheads shows parallel blood vessels. Red scale bar is 1000 μm.

    Article Snippet: We examined gene expression using the Xenopus tropicalis Affymetrix genome array during three phases of regeneration, uncovering more than 1,000 genes that are significantly modulated during tail regeneration.

    Techniques: Immunostaining

    Array analysis of X. tropicalis tail regeneration . ( A ) The schematic diagrams of the early, intermediate, and late stages of tail regeneration. The circled areas depict the portion of tissue, and hence the RNA, collected and used for array analysis. ( B ) Shows the similarities of the eight arrays (four array time points in duplicate) using principal component analysis (PCA) mapping.

    Journal: BMC Developmental Biology

    Article Title: Genome-wide analysis of gene expression during Xenopus tropicalis tadpole tail regeneration

    doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-11-70

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Array analysis of X. tropicalis tail regeneration . ( A ) The schematic diagrams of the early, intermediate, and late stages of tail regeneration. The circled areas depict the portion of tissue, and hence the RNA, collected and used for array analysis. ( B ) Shows the similarities of the eight arrays (four array time points in duplicate) using principal component analysis (PCA) mapping.

    Article Snippet: We examined gene expression using the Xenopus tropicalis Affymetrix genome array during three phases of regeneration, uncovering more than 1,000 genes that are significantly modulated during tail regeneration.

    Techniques:

    Analysis  X.tropicalis  array

    Journal: BMC Developmental Biology

    Article Title: Genome-wide analysis of gene expression during Xenopus tropicalis tadpole tail regeneration

    doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-11-70

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis X.tropicalis array

    Article Snippet: We examined gene expression using the Xenopus tropicalis Affymetrix genome array during three phases of regeneration, uncovering more than 1,000 genes that are significantly modulated during tail regeneration.

    Techniques: Expressing

    RT-qPCR Primer and Probe Sequences

    Journal: BMC Developmental Biology

    Article Title: Genome-wide analysis of gene expression during Xenopus tropicalis tadpole tail regeneration

    doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-11-70

    Figure Lengend Snippet: RT-qPCR Primer and Probe Sequences

    Article Snippet: We examined gene expression using the Xenopus tropicalis Affymetrix genome array during three phases of regeneration, uncovering more than 1,000 genes that are significantly modulated during tail regeneration.

    Techniques: Sequencing